Drainage checks for Austin site plans, before the City reviewer.
Bolteniq reads the drainage tables in a City of Austin site-plan set and runs two dozen checks against the DCM, ECM and LDC. It flags arithmetic and consistency errors. You confirm every value. Your PE stays the engineer of record.
A free, supervised pilot for a small group of Austin firms. You don't need to send anything.
Confirm which one the sealed set should carry.
6 more to decide, 2 notes. 16 checks with nothing to report.
Austin review is long, and some of it is arithmetic
From the City's own comment reports on 85 recent Austin site plans, public on AB+C.
- 4resubmittals for the median plan after the City's first review. Nearly 4 in 10 took 5 or more.
- 9 weeksmedian from one City comment report to the next, redesign and resubmittal included.
- 13 of 32sampled plans got at least one comment in the first review about a calculation that did not check out or numbers that disagreed.
Those are the comments Bolteniq is built to catch before you submit: the plan above is one where the City asked for the R-3 and drawdown calculations to be rechecked.
What it does with a plan set
Reads the drainage tables
Drainage areas, Tc, peak flows, ponds, R-3, R-6 and R-11 forms, pipes and inlets. Each value sits next to the sheet it came from.
Runs two dozen checks
Against the City of Austin DCM, ECM and LDC. Each finding names the rule it is based on and the printed values it points at.
Leaves the decisions to you
You confirm or correct every value. It does not design anything.
Vojtech Hardy, founder
Vojtech builds Bolteniq and runs the pilot. He comes from applied AI: training and evaluating language models, then building AI into Filevine, a case-management platform used by US law firms.
See it on one of your own plans
We pull one of your recent approved Austin site plans from AB+C ourselves, run it, and send you what it flags, next to the comments the City made on that plan. You don't need to send anything.
Join the free pilot